diagnoses of ODD

www.madinamerica.com/2012/02/why-anti-authoritarians-are-diagnosed-as-mentally-ill/

Very important American write-up of insight into psychiatric diagnoses of anti-authoritarian personalities in childhood, with “oppositional defiant disorder” and it resulting in political repression. Linked to ADHD diagnoses and resultant drugging regimes too. Notices that you likely have to be a pro-authoritarian personality to get through the hoops involved in becoming a psychiatrist, and having got there, they find freethinking personalities a threat to their own self-esteem and want to destroy them.

Advertisements

George Monbiot on unaccountability of cruelty in schools

www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/jan/16/boarding-school-bastion-cruelty

It’s an article on boarding schools and their political acceptability. His thoughts on how power is arranged to skate around questions of damaging children apply in many non-boarding settings too, and the horrors he exposes happening in Texas include locking up an attention deficit boy for 6 years for overturning a school desk at age 12.

On British boarding schools: Those on the right will not defend these children as they will not criticise private schools. Those on the left won’t defend them, as they see them as privileged and therefore undeserving of concern.

Gendered Intelligence

To a party whose existence I came across in the Metro. Considering they are called Gendered Intelligence, their position was really unintelligent:

I saw your claim to class as transgender “anyone who challenges gender norms”. I find this dangerously on the bullies’ side.

The evil in gender norms is that they oppress personal liberty to make personal choices. They are a way for oppressive societies to predecide folks’ characters for them. If you want your liberty over your own life choices, most survival importantly if you are a straight man choosing that you don’t enjoy violence and are not macho, then you are not in any way identifying as partly a woman or saying you want to be one. It is bullies and bigots, to enforce oppression, who tell you your choices make you a girlie or a poof.

I am an aspie, an able autistic. Our strong side is independence of mind, from complying with the acceptance rules of groups who we don’t fit into anyway by social skill. We often find ourselves in collision with all sorts of norms, we are proud to be scientific proof that norms are evil. So this will include gender norms. Not interested in football, not admiring big strong swaggery yobbos. The reason for these collisions has nothing to do with our sense of gender, nor with who we fancy.

Physical sensitivities are affected by autism too, and relatedly by attention deficit. Reaction to texture, heat, constriction, which affects choices of clothes. I have this, I have a heat sensitivity in favour of shorts. I wrote the article in the Asperger United for April, on how all dress codes and uniforms are a biological abuse crime. Obviously this includes being oppressed by gender attitudes to dress, because they are sometimes inconvenient. Not because we are transgender.

Have you heard of the 2 schoolboys, lucky with the survivability conditions in their schools not being like in ghetto communities, who have gone to school in skirts, by right under gender discrimination, in order to fight against not being allowed shorts? I suffered the same adverse school dress discrimination as them, so have practically all boys, and wrote up my admiration and backing for them. What their bully enemies writing “fag” on their Youtube presence want, what ruins their action, is for you to claim them as transgender.

If a woman can wear a pink watch just because she likes the watch and its unassuming colour on her wrist, without anyone drawing conclusions about her gender, then so can and do I. It would be oppression and slavery to duck doing it. I duck wearing a skirt though because I think there is a danger over the decency laws, given the illogical fault in skirts’ shape. The physical awkwardness of wearing them, the pants problem, that originally was an oppression for women, now can allow indecency to be held against men in them while nothing but arbitrary custom absurdly keeps women immune to that judgment. That I think is why the gender specificity of skirts has never been broken down, when many other gender specificities have. I’m actually writing this in Scotland, too, so it needs to be a strong reasoning, but kilts cluster around you in a subtly different way than skirts. Anyway, a libertarian must want to see all gender specificity of costume destroyed. For you to claim every breach of it under transgender identity is obviously not going to make the gender associations disappear faster!

It has not been answered. That means they want to go on arrogantly flinging transgender labels around to suit themselves roughshod over what is important in other folks’ lives. 

Maurice Frank
6 Aug 2011

 

Adders again

Adders.org are at it again, this time trying to shut up a member who has criticised (not nastily) a member of admin (sounds familiar).
Suddenly her posts get locked, admin starts to make sarky remarks…people are allowed to make unpleasant remarks about her… again familiar. Perhaps this time they’ve learnt a lesson, as they’ve not banned her, perhaps free speech will finally be allowed on adders.org? I particularly liked it when one member of admin commented that they’d never ban anyone for having an opinion because seems to me that’s exactly what keeps happening, specially if that opinion is about a member of admin doing something out of order e.g. Exfactor with Adrian and now this person with Dr Billy.

Think power of being admin is a bit much for some people hmmm. They get to lock posts whenever they feel like it and to boot off anyone they don’t like.

Unimpressed
30 Dec 2006.

Site: All sites discussed have a right of reply. Hence here are some comments copied into the main article, for the sake of even-handedness of prominence for them. But it is not “comment behind people’s backs” for Unimpressed to post here, as it is done openly for anyone to read, and nobody can reasonably be asked to “put up or shut up” on a site where they find intimidatory group dynamics being allowed, can they?

Now they’ve banned her completely!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Why not just call it a support site FOR ADMIN??????????????????????

Unimpressed, March 10

I have made enquiries to ascertain the validity of your statement and find that it is untrue. Nobody has been banned. Perhaps you should ensure you have all the facts and that they are correct before making misleading and incorrect statements.

Unimpressed2, March 16

As with all people calling names they never have there facts right. Too much in a rush to open there mouths and say something without checking first

there was no ban the person requested to leave for reasons of there own.

If the person writing this finds it such an issue why not say so publicly on the site instead of comments behind people’s backs
or is it a case of they will find that the support they enjoy at the moment wont be there for them when the truth about things are reveiled.

And the other members will not find this kind of helpful to a site they feel comfortable with.

Perhaps its time to put up or shut up.

Angry Person, March 16

July 7 !
Now there’s been another cull!

Darky, Chrissie, FeeinLeeds
The site has gone riiiiiiggggghht down the pan.

Even their posts saying bye were deleted. As always admin were allowed to make negative comments about Samantha’s SENDIST tribunal with JM saying she couldn’t see the point but then when people objected posts were locked and when people said bye we’re leaving and mentioned it their posts were deleted. someone needs to ask Caroline what’s going on, such rubbish to say that everyone’s entitled to there opinions and then to delete messages which express opinions about other peoples opinions Not a support site anymore, not at all.

Themostunimpressedofalltheunimpressed

dangerous psychiatrist wants to return to unmitigated school atrocities

This Sunday Mirror item – that’s a tabloid paper, remember – [ link now disappeared, was www.sundaymirror.co.uk/news/tm_headline=naughty-kids-need-discipline-not-drugs-&method=full&objectid=18109811&siteid=94762-name_page.html ]

is exploiting the well-funded fear of overpushed drugs for ADHD, to call for a return to belief in discipline instead of in the reality of ADHD at all.

This when evidence up to a generation old, of serious life-wrecking abuses committed by schools in the name of discipline, are still being systematically suppressed from public awareness. They are neither getting published nor covered in the media – how work pressure and teachers deciding they know best a child’s abilities can make a child’s life impossible. Resulting in a clash that can even be called life-threatening if running away or suicide are the child’s only escape options, otherwise results in descent into the social service/mental health underworld.

Growth in understanding of the neurodiverse or autistic spectrum, whichever you prefer to call it, is the only major gain that has been achieved in the direction of overturning the wall of silence around teachers’ atrocities. A silence there has been a unanimous criminal consensus in the media and politics to maintain. Only the crime of that silence is served when a psychiatrist comes along and says to the tabloid press, okay I’ll back you, dictatorial power for teachers is right and the autistic spectrum isn’t real.

Quoting: “Consultant child psychiatrist Dr Sami Timimi argues that medicalisation of childhood problems is due to a search for “an easy cure that fits in with our fast lifestyles and gives us a quick answer”.

Consultant child psychiatrist. A profession with an overwhelming history, familiar to many spectrumites, of siding with persecution of us and with medical crimes seeking to destroy us. Do you see how Orwellian is the inversion of reality this sinister whitecoat Timimi is trying to pull? Under a cloak of opposing the medical crimes that involve drugs, he is promoting a wider agenda of medical crimes to be perpetrated through sheer authoritarian bullying. He is medicalising us by opposing accepting our reality! A politics of group destruction..

A worldwide emergency alert by the ASD scene is important.

Maurice Frank
1 Dec 2006

Adders – a prominent ADHD site

As emailed to the membership of the prominent ADHD site Adders by a hurt member, who has received many supportive messages form other members (see comments):

Standing up against unfairness!

Dear Adders people,
Imagine that your child was permanently excluded from school. One deputy head said it was because your child had been ‘causing arguments’, but could give no evidence about what arguments had been caused, when or with who.
The headteacher gave another reason, but it completely contradicted the reason given by the deputy head.
Would that seem fair to you?
Wouldn’t you then keep asking for a reason why your child had been excluded?
Wouldn’t you kick up a fuss and protest the exclusion?

My analogy, as many of you know, relates to me – banned from Adders for a reason nobody will tell me. If you’re a newbie, watch out: this could be you, too, if you disagree with any of the Admin team about anything!

Why was I changed to guest status in the first place and where is the evidence of my causing of arguments?

Sometime in June, I agreed with Samantha on the Adders forums that Adrian (loverablemole/ possibly Cheekychap too) had been a bit rude to her in a post; I also said he probably didn’t realise he had come across so rudely. This was apparently ‘abuse’ of Adrian, although Samantha remains able to post. I also started a thread talking about censorship on Adders in general, like when Bojangles got banned for having opinions others disagreed with. At no time was I ever rude about any individual.

I then had trouble replying to Adrian’s test emails, as they kept getting returned to me.

I posted the following to him on the 3rd July:
“I’ve now had two emails ‘undelivered’ to your email address.
Perhaps this is why people can’t reply to your test emails? Just a thought.This is exfactor. I do not choose to post anymore at the moment, but wish for my membership to remain should I choose to contact anyone through the website in the future.”

I got the following reply from Adrian:
“funny no-one else has a problem replying to my tset email and if we chose to delete memberships we do this for a number of reasons and i have every right as admin for the site to put your membership on restictions as you have caused arguements a nuber of yimes on adders.org and it is yor end as i have people reply to their test emails and also your membership has been put onto guest status”

I then obviously complained! I got the following message from Caroline:
“Sorry but you have not been banned. We were simply carrying out your own request. You sent email to Adrian saying that you no longer wished to post but you wished to leave your membership open so you could get in touch with people from the forum boards Therefore we changed your membership status to that of Guest.”

(SO ALREADY THESE CONTRADICT – TURNED TO GUEST BECAUSE I ‘ASKED’ TO BE – NOT TRUE – JUST SAID I DIDN’T WANT TO POST AT THE MOMENT – ASKED TO REMAIN A MEMBER” OR BANNED FOR ‘CAUSING ARGUMENTS’ ? )

I emailed her back to say, oh, well you misunderstood, but she ignored me, only to respond when I had tried to post about it on the boards saying “after that you decided to spam the boards this is abuse and therefore the final reason was for abuse of the boards (now they had another excuse!)I do not have to explain myself to you anyway at the end of the day I pay for the site – ok so there are some donations now which help – however still the bulk of the costs come from my own pocketyou have
>> abused the rules of the board by spamming and using numerous log in names (like Adrian – Loverablemole and Cheekychap (probably) – but it’s OK for him, hey?) therefore I am free to do as I see feel fit” (but it’s not censorship, oooh no)

JD tells me, yesterday:
“You were temporarily changed to guest status as you were posting offensively on the boards about a member. ”

(Oh…who was I ‘posting offensively’ about? Can you quote the offensive bit, please, just to enlighten me?)

So, what’s the truth? Someone’s distorting things, aren’t they – why was I turned to guest in the first place? It all contradicts – someone’s not being honest.
I apologise to members of the forums whose evening on the 3rd July was disturbed when Caroline chose to turn the boards off, but if what they were doing by banning me was so ok, what is the problem with letting people read about it, like I am doing now? A lot of you will think: go away, you silly woman, and that’s fine (I’m sure Madhouse, Noogsy and Keeny will be able to tell me how ‘sick’ and ‘sad’ I am again as on the thread started about me on 4th July- obviously I’m not allowed to say Adrian is rude, as that’s offensive, but they can say that about me and that’s fine – no hypocrisy there then!), but surely I am entitled to ask a question???????! All I was doing was posting this information, but they kept deleting it. I appreciate that my behaviour on that night broke terms and conditions, but NOTHING I had done up till then ever had, so the reason for banning me just seems to come down to Adrian not liking being told that his manner can sometimes be a bit snappy and rude when people are asking a question.

So, consider my question: Why was I changed to guest status in the first place and where is the evidence of my causing of arguments?

Not only that, but a ‘number of times’, apparently! If anyone has got that evidence of me ‘posting offensively’ before the 3rd of July, please forward it to me so that I can at least know why I have been banned from a website I have been posting on supportively for over a year, offering advice and support to others…cos Admin refuse to tell me why I am banned and can’t even agree themselves on the reason!

JD, having emailed me this week to say I could start posting again if I agree to the Terms and Conditions (which I agreed to), has now said I should go away and set up my own website rather than tell me the answer to that question, cos I said I agreed to the T&C but wanted my question answered first!I have also been asked to apologise to the person I offended, but as they won’t tell me the reason I was banned, I can’t tell who I was banned for offending!

You may think it is silly to be bothered, but unfairness from anyone, adult or child, to anyone else, adult or child, really really annoys me, especially when someone is prevented from expressing their opinion and people won’t back up the accusations they make!

I am able to get onto the adders site, and am even able to post under another identity, although the Admin team have tried to block most of my IP addresses to stop me from even READING the forums, but that’s not the point. ‘Exfactor’ should not have been banned in the first place!

I know most of you will totally be against what I am saying, and that’s fine. I don’t need to you email me to tell me that! However, if you have any actual evidence that what happened on 3rd July was fair i.e. any proof of me breaking the rules prior to that by offending you or others/ causing arguments, which would justify me being turned into a guest, please do pass it on.

I wouldn’t put up with this if my son was excluded from school for no good reason, so I won’t put up with it for me either.

Exfactor 
26 Jul 2006